You are currently browsing the category archive for the 'Uncategorized' category.
The EGNOS Open Service is available to any user equipped with a GPS receiver that is compatible with satellite-based augmentation systems. The service, one of there being made available, is provided free of charge without any guarantee or resulting liability, the Commission stated.
SOURCE: GSA
EGNOS is ready to use as an open and free satellite-based navigation service, the European Commission announced today.
The improved accuracy of Europe’s first satellite navigation system ushers in a new era for location-based services on the continent. Businesses and citizens can use EGNOS-enabled receivers for tasks that require greater precision, such as crop spraying, tracking vehicles and pedestrian navigation.
Antonio Tajani, the European Commission’s Vice-President for Transport, said: “This opens the door for European businesses and citizens to benefit from the myriad of better applications and new opportunities made possible by more precise navigation signals.”
EGNOS, a satellite-based augmentation system, represents Europe’s first contribution to satellite navigation. It is also a precursor to Galileo, the global navigation satellite system that Europe is developing.
EGNOS increases the accuracy of GPS signals over Europe to within two metres. GPS is accurate to about 10 metres. Augmentation systems correct GPS by taking into account atmospheric disturbances and other factors that may affect the integrity of the signals.
EGNOS can be used by the aviation sector once it is certified for Safety-of-Life services. © ESA
EGNOS can be used by the aviation sector once it is certified for Safety-of-Life services. © ESA
Benefits for businesses and Europeans
The EGNOS Open Service is available to any user equipped with a GPS receiver that is compatible with satellite-based augmentation systems. The service, one of there being made available, is provided free of charge without any guarantee or resulting liability, the Commission stated.
Most receivers sold in Europe today meet that requirement. Receiver manufacturers and application developers will be able to provide their customers with the benefits of EGNOS without requiring any authorisation or receiver- specific certification.
In announcing the availability of the system’s Open Service, the Commission noted that it will support the development of new applications in such sectors as agriculture, transport and personal navigation services.
For example, farmers can use EGNOS for spraying fertilizers on their crops more precisely, allowing them to save money and reduce any impact on the environment. In the transport sector, automatic road-tolling services are being developed using the increased precision provided by EGNOS. Blind people will be able to use EGNOS-enabled GPS receivers and services to more accurately navigate city streets.
More EGNOS services to come
The Commission is on track to provide more EGNOS services next year. A key milestone will be achieved in 2010, when EGNOS is expected to be certified for use by Europe’s aviation sector in compliance with the Single European Sky regulations.
The Commission will then declare the readiness of EGNOS’ Safety-Of-Life Service, which will provide a valuable integrity message warning the user of any malfunction of the GPS signal within six seconds. This integrity message is essential when satellite navigation is used for applications where lives are at stake.
The Commission also expects to launch the EGNOS Commercial Service next year. This service is currently being tested by a number of European companies.
The Open Service and the Safety-of-Life Service are provided free of charge. The European Union is committed to the long term support of EGNOS, which will provide services alongside Galileo, when it becomes operational. For example, the Commission is working to extend the geographical coverage of the three satellites transmitting the EGNOS signal. While the signal currently covers most European states, it has the built-in capability to extend the coverage area to other regions, such as countries on the EU’s borders and North Africa.
Sending the correction signals
The EGNOS signal, which provides the correction data needed to make GPS more accurate, is transmitted via transponders aboard three geostationary satellites over Europe. About 40 positioning stations and four control centres are at the heart of the system’s network on the ground.
Through a contract with the Commission, the European Satellite Services Provider (ESSP) is charged with the operational management and maintenance of EGNOS. The contract between the Commission and ESSP SaS, which is based in Toulouse, France, was signed on 30 September and runs until the end of 2013. ESSP was founded by seven air navigation service providers in Europe.
EGNOS is a joint project of the European Space Agency (ESA), the Commission and Eurocontrol, the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation. It was developed by a number of European businesses that compose the EGNOS Operator and Infrastructure Group.
Since 1 April of this year, EGNOS has been owned and managed by the European Union. The ESA continues its role as the system’s design and procurement agency through a delegation agreement with the Commission.
EU online sources ranked by research experts
Intute has just released a survey about EU sources and online use, which we very much advise you to take. You can visit it here: http://feedback.intute.ac.uk/eu2009/.
If you don’t know yet, Intute (http://www.intute.ac.uk) is a free online service that helps people to find the best web resources for studies and research. It groups millions of online resources in one place, and in contrast with Google the materials are not only ranked by number of searches, but also by subject specialists who review and evaluate resources.
Please fill in the survey and participate.
Source: EurActive
Czech President Václav Klaus again surprised friends and foes alike by signing his country’s Lisbon Treaty ratification today (3 November) at 15.00 CET, just hours after the Czech Constitutional Court had given the text its green light. The EU’s reform treaty is now fully ratified and is expected to enter into force on 1 December.
Klaus, a staunch Eurosceptic, announced he had signed the Lisbon Treaty at Prague Castle, just a few hours after the Czech Constitutional Court ruled that the treaty is compatible with the country’s constitution.
An hour later, he held a televised press conference during which he said he had expected the verdict to be in favour of the Lisbon Treaty. He said he respected the ruling but he does not agree with it.
“The treaty’s enforcement will limit the Czech Republic’s sovereignty, regardless of the Constitutional Court’s verdict,” he added, quoted by the Czech press.
Klaus lashed at the court’s judges, describing their behaviour as “obstructive” and their verdict as “politically motivated”.
According to EU practice, new treaties enter into force on the first day of the month after they are deposited in Rome. This means that the Lisbon Treaty could enter into force at on 1 December, with a new 27-member European Commission, a permanent Council president and a High Representative for Foreign Affairs being selected in the meantime.
Joseph Daul, Chairman of the EPP group, welcomed the news from Prague. “Europe can now move forward. The conclusion of the ratification process means that the treaty will enter into force without further delay this year. The treaty will allow effective European action in areas where solutions are urgent, such as the financial and economic crises, climate change and energy,” he said.
“I call on the European Council to nominate the College of the European Commission, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the president of the Council without delay,” Daul further declared.
The Swedish EU Presidency is widely expected to call an extraordinary EU summit to decide on the top jobs, most likely to be held on 13-14 November.
It took eight years of intricate negotiations for the EU’s new reform treaty to see the light of day, since EU leaders first debated its proposed reforms at the 14-15 December Laeken summit in 2001.
"The commission is closely monitoring the use of behavioural advertising to ensure respect for our privacy rights,"
Source: EUobserver [edited]
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS – There is a dark side to some of the impressive new online technologies that are appearing, from social networking to behavioural advertising to RFID ‘smart chips’, the European Commission’s internet chief has warned.
While such technologies offer great vistas of opportunity, the commission is monitoring their development “closely” for the very real potential threats to privacy they contain, information society commissioner Viviane Reding said on Monday at a debate on the future of the internet in Brussels.
The future of the internet contains pitfalls as well as possibilities, warns Brussels. Ms Reding threatened that if social networking sites such as Facebook themselves do not make moves to ensure the profiles of minors are kept private, she would intervene with legislation to force them to do so.
“Privacy must, in my view, be a high priority for social networking providers and for their users. I firmly believe that at least the profiles of minors must be private by default and unavailable to internet search engines,” she told the meeting in the European Parliament, organised by Icomp, an industry initiative backed by Microsoft to discuss the online marketplace.
“The European Commission has already called on social networking sites to deal with minors’ profiles carefully, by means of self-regulation,” she continued. “I am ready to follow this up with new rules if I have to.” But she said she worries about all users of social networking, not just children, and fears that most users of such sites are unaware of the dangers to their privacy.
“Social networking has a strong potential for a new form of communication and for bringing people together, wherever they are,” she said. “But is every social networker really aware that all pictures and information uploaded on social networking profiles can be accessed and used by anyone on the web?”
Advertising concerns
The EU’s internet chief also said that behavioural advertising – those ads that appear that seem to know exactly the sort of books or vacations or concerts you would be interested in – was “another privacy concern repeatedly mentioned to the European Commission these days.”
Behavioural adverts are able to do this by keeping track of internet users’ web browsing to better target them with advertisements. Ms Reding said that the EU executive was watching this development for infringement of privacy: ” European privacy rules are crystal clear: a person’s information can only be used with their prior consent.”
“The commission is closely monitoring the use of behavioural advertising to ensure respect for our privacy rights,” she added. “I will not shy away from taking action where an EU country falls short of this duty.” The commissioner also warned of the perils contained within the “internet of things” – the use of radio frequency identification (RFID), or smart chips, that could be attached to any product.
There is enormous potential from a world in which all mugs, containers, shoes or airplane parts are attached with tiny identifying devices. Analysts predict that common events that plague businesses and individuals such as running out of stock, product wastage, and theft. Losing your keys could be a thing of the past, if we know where a product is at all times.
But there are also great privacy pitfalls in such a world, noted Ms Reding. “I am convinced [RFID] will only be welcomed in Europe if they are used by the consumers and not on the consumers,” she told the crowd.
“No European should carry a chip in one of their possessions without being informed precisely of what they are used for, with the choice to remove or switch it off at any time.” “The “Internet of Things” will only work if it is accepted by the people.” Her speech also focussed on the need for a single online market for digital content, which she has repeatedly argued is fragmented, a competitive disadvantage for Europe when compared to the United States.
Before the end of the current commission’s mandate, she said, she and internal market commissioner Charlie McCreevy would publish a “reflection paper” over a set of possible legislative options to create such a single digital market.
Ms Reding would also like to see the development of a European Rights Registry to ease the digitalisation of books. Such a registry would aim to overcome the current problem of books republishing online books that are out of print, but whose copyright ownership remains cloudy.
Although the Luxembourgish Ms Reding has expressed an interest in returning to Brussels as part of President Jose Manuel Barroso’s second college of commissioners, it is not clear that if she returns, she would be awarded the same dossier. She underlined that in making her comments on the future of the internet, she did not want to “pre-empt the new commission.”
Money should be divided between key low-carbon technologies that can move Europe from 80% dependence on fossil fuels to 80% emissions cuts by 2050
Source: EurActiv [edited]
The European Commission revealed its long-awaited blueprint for tripling Europe’s energy research funding within the next decade, in a bid to shift monies towards supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy in the next EU budget. The EU executive calls for the energy research budget to be increased to €50 billion over the next ten years. This would require yearly flows from both the public and private sectors to jump from their current €3bn to €8bn, it calculated.
The Communication on Financing the Development of Low-Carbon Technologies sets out how this money should be divided between key low-carbon technologies that can move Europe from 80% dependence on fossil fuels to 80% emissions cuts by 2050. The research priorities were identified in the 2007 Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) that intended to reassert Europe’s competitiveness by putting declining EU energy research budgets back on track.
The financing plan, which was originally due out last year, was partly delayed due to the financial crisis, which required new thinking on how to reactivate growth, Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs told journalists. Furthermore, drawing up roadmaps for the various technologies took time, he added.
The final plan earmarks €6bn for research into wind energy, which the Commission believes could produce a fifth of the EU’s electricity by 2020. The money would help to fund developments offshore, where winds are stronger, by investing in next-generation turbines and new structures.
Solar energy would get €16bn for developing new photovoltaic concepts and large industrial concentrating solar power (CSP) installations to contribute 15% of EU electricity in ten years’ time. Bioenergy research would also get €9bn so that it could provide 14% of EU energy while respecting sustainability criteria.
In order to integrate renewables and implement the internal energy market, electricity grids would get €2 billion so that half of the networks can operate along a “smart grid” principle. Apart from renewables, carbon capture and storage (CCS) is set to receive €13bn for up to 12 demonstration projects. Nuclear research would also get €7bn for putting the fourth generation into operation.
The financing proposal also foresees €11bn for a ‘Smart Cities’ programme, in order to counter criticism that the SET-Plan disregards energy efficiency. Between 25 and 30 cities are to be upgraded with low-carbon houses and transport so that they emit 40% less greenhouse gas emissions in 2020 than they did in 1990.
In addition, the Commission is calling for more money for future breakthrough technologies, such as motors fuelled directly by sunlight or batteries which store power at ten times their current density.
Public partnering with private money
The Commission believes that public-private partnerships are the most credible way to go about funding energy research. However, it did not spell out how the financial burden should be shared between the two. Currently, energy research funding is 70% private and 30% public, excluding nuclear research. The EU executive argues that a “significant rise” in the public share will be necessary in the short term to give businesses incentives to work towards public climate and energy supply goals at a time of recession.
In projects where the risks are higher, public funding should assume a greater role, the Commission says. To optimise the level of intervention, it advocates the use of European programmes, particularly where there is a clear added value of EU-level action, for example in the case of programmes that are too expensive for a single member state to fund. Currently, 80% of public investment in non-nuclear energy research is made at national level.
Although the communication does not announce any new EU funds, it argues that “an increase in the proportion of the public investment at Community level may need to be one of the options explored in the budget review”.
launched on 20 November, 2008. Europeana is a multi-lingual online collection of millions of digitised books, journals, films, maps, photographs and music from European museums, libraries, archives and multi-media collections. It is accessible to every citizen with an internet connection. It also preserves the items for future generations.
Source: EuroParliament [edited]
You can now access books, journals, films, maps etc from across Europe via the EU’s online library, Europeana. It’s a great idea but it’s not all plain sailing: web copyright rules are not the same in all EU countries, there are issues about paying for items that are still under copyright and should there be a minimum standard for content? The Culture Committee discussed the future challenges for Europeana Tuesday morning.
German Green Helga Trüpel will draft parliament’s report. “We have to find means to encourage Member States to provide more funding for digitisation…My big political goal is to achieve the balance between making books available and rewarding the authors. Google scanned a lot of books under copyright and then the authors complained and went to court,” she told us.
About Europeana
- currently has 4.6 million digital item
- includes paintings, maps, photos, books, newspapers, letters, music, radio broadcasts, films, TV broadcasts
- 47% of contributions are from France
- will re-launch in 2010 with over 10 million digital objects
- funded by the European Commission and EU countries
- hosted by the National Library of the Netherlands
“Europeana might never be as rich as Google Books, because it will not be financed through advertisements,” she said. “But it is very important for us to show that there is another possibility: to do it with public funding. If we want to defend our European social model and go for cultural diversity, we need Europeana.”
What is Europeana?
It was launched on 20 November, 2008. Europeana is a multi-lingual online collection of millions of digitised books, journals, films, maps, photographs and music from European museums, libraries, archives and multi-media collections. It is accessible to every citizen with an internet connection. It also preserves the items for future generations.
Europeana’s collection has doubled since its launch and there are now more than 4.6 million items. The aim is to have 10 million digitised objects by 2010 and the Commission has launched a public consultation about the future challenges, which ends 15 November, to get the views of libraries, rights holders, IT companies and consumer organisation, as well as the European Parliament.
The final result shows 67.1% of the electorate voted in favour of the Treaty, with 32.9% voting against. This represents a 20% swing towards the 'yes' campaign compared to the 2008 referendum.
Source: Euractiv [edited]
Irish voters have approved the EU’s reform treaty by a margin of two to one, lifting the EU out of institutional limbo after years of democratic setbacks and blockage. All eyes now turn to Eurosceptic Czech President Václav Klaus to sign the treaty.
The final result shows 67.1% of the electorate voted in favour of the Treaty, with 32.9% voting against. This represents a 20% swing towards the ‘yes’ campaign compared to the 2008 referendum. Turnout was 58%, an increase of around 6%.
Pressure on Prague and Warsaw
In Brussels, political parties from across the spectrum are turning up the heat on Czech President Václav Klaus to sign the Lisbon Treaty into law, with European Commission President José Manuel Barroso saying all Europeans had now backed the Lisbon Treaty, either directly or indirectly.
Speaking on Saturday (3 October), the Czech president declined to say how he would proceed with ratification after the Irish results. “The question does not exist today. Today I have a ban [...] until the Constitutional Court releases something,” he told reporters.
Final ratification is also due in Poland, where President Lech Kaczyński had said he was willing to ratify the charter if Ireland voted ‘yes’.
Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer said he believes the country will complete ratification by the end of the year, a government statement said. “The prime minister [...] is convinced that ratification will be completed in a way that the Lisbon Treaty can take effect by the end of 2009,” the statement said.
Many political analysts expect Klaus will be forced under heavy EU pressure to sign the treaty into law before the end of the year, helping the bloc to forge a bigger role for itself as the global balance of power shifts following the financial crisis.
EU summit on 29 October
A summit of EU leaders is planned in Brussels on 29 October, at which Klaus is expected to come under heavy pressure to ratify. “We have a summit at the end of October and that might be perfect timing for this kind of discussion,” said Fredrick Reinfeldt, prime minister of Sweden and current holder of the European Union presidency.
With the ‘yes’ vote due to be confirmed, the chances of Europe taking a great steps to become a better organised Union with a stronger voice in world affairs dramatically increase. The treaty would give the EU a long-term president and stronger foreign policy chief.
Economic crisis bolstered ‘yes’ vote
Many voters were thought more likely to back the treaty second time around because of the economic crisis, the impact of which EU aid has helped to curb. The European Commission offered 14.8 million euros to help workers at Dell’s Irish plant on 19 September, just weeks before the vote (EurActiv 21/09/09).
The mood at the main Dublin counting centre was a far cry from last year, when officials watched in disbelief as voters rejected the reform charter, holding up the foreign policy ambitions of a bloc representing 495 million people.
The atmosphere was calm after fraught campaigning that pitched Ireland’s main political parties against anti-abortion groups, pacifists and British Eurosceptics. Irish approval represents be a boon for the former ‘Celtic Tiger’ economy, which was spared an Icelandic-style collapse because of its membership of the euro zone. It is still reliant on goodwill from Brussels and Frankfurt for its future recovery. Many people in Ireland are struggling to come to terms with unemployment, higher taxes and the possibility of lower social welfare payments in the next austerity budget.
Irish borrowing costs would likely drop and its banking stocks rise on Monday if the result on Saturday is a ‘yes’, according to predictions prior to the ballot.
Survey conducted one week after the European elections held in June 2009. Over the period between 12 June and 6 July a total of 26 830 European citizens were interviewed in an effort to gain a better insight into the reasons why they had - or had not - voted.
Source: EuroParliament [edited]
Parliament has published a Eurobarometer survey of 26 830 people across Europe carried out in the month following the 4-7 June European elections. Citizens were asked about their reasons for choosing whether or not to vote, and, if they did vote, what factors they took into account in deciding which party to vote for.
Overall turnout in the elections was down compared with the 2004 elections by 2.47 percentage points, a smaller decline than in the past. This overall figure masks major national variations, with turnout up in eight Member States, about the same in a further eight, moderately lower in seven countries and markedly lower in four Member States.
Impact of election information campaigns
More than two-thirds of those surveyed (67 per cent) said they remembered seeing, hearing or reading information material encouraging them to vote. The proportions are similar among different age groups and users of different media.
Views of politics in general key factor
The main reasons cited by non-voters for their choice mainly relate to the wider political climate: a lack of confidence in politics in general (28 per cent), the view that voting makes no difference (17 per cent) or a lack of interest in politics (17 per cent). By contrast, only 10 per cent cited a lack of knowledge of the EU, EP or the elections and just 8 per cent said they were dissatisfied with the EP as an institution.
Socio-demographic analysis
- The survey indicates that older citizens were more likely to vote than younger ones, and that those who had spent longer in education were more likely to vote than those who left school earlier. Those in senior or professional jobs were more likely to vote than those in low-paid work. The rate of abstention was particularly high (66.1 per cent) among those who say they have problems paying their regular bills
- Results:
- The turnout was 43%. However, this EU 27 average must be viewed in the light of the individual country results, which show a significant increase in turnout in eight countries, very little change in eight others and a very sharp fall in the 11 others.
- The survey was again notable for highlighting the clear disparities in voting behaviour among social groups: fewer women vote than men, fewer young people than elderly people, fewer unemployed people than senior managers, fewer early school leavers than graduates, and slightly fewer city dwellers than inhabitants of rural areas.
- 67% of Europeans remembered having seen a television or print media campaign encouraging them to vote. There is no way of distinguishing between exposure to the European or to the various national campaigns to encourage people to vote in the European elections, but those campaigns did have some effect. At the same time, one third of voters who said they voted in national elections stated that they did not vote in European elections.
Contrary to widespread media coverage which would appear to suggest otherwise, the European Parliament study revealed that 'anti-Europe' campaigns did not mobilise substantial numbers of voters
Source: EurActiv
A third of voters who decided not to use their ballot in this summer’s European Parliament elections only made their decision in the final days of the election campaign, according to a European Parliament Eurobarometer survey conducted in the month following the June poll.
Background:
Overall turnout in the elections was down by 2.47 percentage points compared with the 2004 elections, a smaller decline than in the past. This overall figure masks major national variations, with turnout up in eight member states, about the same in a further eight, moderately lower in seven countries and markedly lower in four member states.
While successive EU enlargements have increased the number of sitting MEPs and the European Parliament’s powers have increased substantially with each change to the EU treaties, voter turnout in European elections has been in constant decline, leaving the Parliament open to criticism that it lacks legitimacy.
32% of these abstainers said they had decided not to vote either several days before the election (16%), or on election day itself (16%), the survey reveals.
The survey of 26,830 people across Europe was carried out in the month following the 4-7 June elections. Citizens were asked to give their reasons for choosing whether or not to vote, and, if they did vote, what factors they took into account in deciding which party to vote for.
Half of all abstainers declared an “attachment to Europe” and 36% in that group said they only made the decision not to vote either on election day itself or in the final days leading up to the ballot.
Parliament analysts saw this as an encouragement, indicating that the population might “constitute a group of electors who could be persuaded to vote” in future.
Failure to attract voters
Julia De Clerck-Sachsse, a research fellow at the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), said failure to attract pro-European voters was the responsibility of both the European Parliament and the political parties themselves.
De Clerck-Sachsse said this failure should also be seen in the wider context of “a decrease in participation at national level, and the general disillusionment with politicians and with party politics,” which she says can be seen throughout Europe.
The common perception that politics is distant and less relevant to voters is amplified at European level because the European Parliament is simply further away, and seems “less transparent and sometimes less democratic” in comparison to national parliaments, argues the CEPS expert.
De Clerck-Sachsse says that the prominent role the Socialists will play in the new Parliament, and the probability that they will get the presidency of the Parliament in the second half of its mandate, despite having “failed to mobilise at the elections,” is just the kind of parliamentary behaviour that adds to voter disillusionment.
Although turnout in the elections fell to 43% from 45.47% for the previous ballot, the decline was smaller than during past elections.
However, the EU-wide turnout figures conceal significant variations between member states. Turnout in eleven countries actually increased in this year’s election, countering the impact of the headline EU-wide figure.
Successes in increasing voter turnout came in countries where politicians had made an effort to bring European issues into national debates, observed De Clerck-Sachsse, pointing to the example of Sweden, where she said there was “much more scrutiny of EU policy,” resulting in Sweden moving from “Eurosceptic to EU-favourable” and increasing its turnout by 7.68 percentage points.
European elections still fare badly compared to national elections, indicates the survey, with a third of those voting in national elections choosing not to vote in the EU poll and only 3% indicating that they only vote in European elections.
Youth vote decreasing
Worryingly for the Parliament, the youth vote decreased as a proportion of the overall ballot by 4% at this year’s election, with the study reporting “a difference of 21 percentage points between the 18-24 age group and the 55+ age group”.
Youngsters formed the largest group to declare that they were under-informed about the elections, according to the survey results, with 50% feeling they had received too little information.
Differences in participation were even starker between the various professional categories. Despite the economy and employment being one of the most prominent issues in the campaign, only 28% of Europe’s unemployed voted, while at the other end of the spectrum, over 53% of executive directors and managers turned out to cast their ballot.
Contrary to widespread media coverage which would appear to suggest otherwise, the European Parliament study revealed that ‘anti-Europe’ campaigns did not mobilise substantial numbers of voters, reporting that “of the 32% of people who felt no attachment to Europe, only one third of them voted (33.5%)”. Meanwhile, of the 64% who said they felt attached to Europe, the survey indicated that 49% cast their ballot.
Source: EurActiv
The European Commission is pushing member states to include media education in their compulsory curricula to help EU citizens become more active users of new media and increase their awareness of potential risks, such as privacy breeches or hidden advertisements.
“Interacting with the media now means a lot more than writing to a newspaper. Consumers today can create their own content and make new works by transforming third party content,” saidexternal Information Society Commissioner Viviane Reding.
“However, people who cannot use new media like social networks or digital TV will find it hard to interact with and take part in the world around them”, added the Commissioner.
Indeed, although coverage and economic offers of new media is increasing in Europe, some invisible barriers continue limiting the access to more modern forms of communication.
Almost one out of four of the citizens admitting to not have an Internet connection say that they are not online because they do not know how to use the Web, according to a surveyexternal conducted in 2008 by the European statistical office, Eurostat.
The Commission considers media illiteracy as a new form of social exclusion and therefore is pushing member states to narrow the gaps that the development of new technologies are creating between generations and between people with different economic or social background.
The European treaties do not allow Brussels to directly regulate education policies, but the EU Executive has already proven effective in convincing member states to adopt specific legislative measures in different fields.
With the support of the European Parliament (see background), the Commission issued yesterday (20 August) a recommendationPdf external calling member states to introduce training courses on new media for adults, and to include media education in compulsory curricula for young students.
Although more than 85% of young Europeans use the Internet and has regular experiences of new media, such as chats, social networks, blogs, the Commission intends to target the youth because many of young users ignore the threats of the Web and new technologies.
Young users are indeed the most likely to have bad experiences of the Internet, in particular for their over-relaxed approach to personal data and their low level of awareness of the dangers of publicly showing private information.
The recommendation encourages “providing citizens with information, especially aimed at young people, on how their personal data are processed in the context of tailored offers, notably interactive advertising, in the full respect of existing legal provisions”, reads the text.
To reach this target, Brussels calls to “open a debate on the inclusion of media literacy in the compulsory education curriculum”.
The Commission also wants to see citizens to switch from media users to media content producers through blogs, social netwroks and other new forms of communication. “Citizens are being talked to all the time, but can they talk back? If they can use the media in a competent and creative way we would take a step towards a new generation of democratic participation”, argued Commissioner Reding.
However, an increased involvement of citizens in the production of media content is also a reason of concern. Angela Mills, Executive Director of the European Publishers Council, warned of the risk of moving towards a “kind of fast-food of the mass Internet media”.
With the proliferation of blogs and unchecked content, the role of journalism in society is under threat. “Many news-hungry internet users – Mills argued – may indeed be well informed but some, who merely browse and graze and skim without questioning the sources or motives of their information providers, may not be”, leading to mass dis-information.
Recent Comments